Skip to content

Testing. One. Two. Three.

June 30, 2012

If you’re going to argue stuff around here, you have to be a little honest about what you say.

And the organizers of the Challenge to Dennis Van Roekel and the NEA, a group called United Opt Out National, have not met even that minimum requirement.

On the eve of leaving for the National Education Association’s national meeting, I received their unsolicited call. As a thirty year member of the NEA and a life-time union member, I was not pleased with their threats.

The NEA’s eventual eradication as a legitimate organization in support of public education will be met with a bittersweet jubilation.  Make no mistake: we do not negotiate with children’s lives.

I thought this was crazy talk. I still do.

At a time when public service worker unions are under assault by Republicans and Democrats, here was a group, claiming to support public schools and opposed to standardized testing making threats. Against who? The DOE policy makers? The corporate reformers? Pearson? Obama? Romney? Duncan? Rhee? Nope. Nope. Nope. Nope.

The teachers union.

And not even just the union leadership. Many of the comments from the Opt Out supporters following my original post directed their main fire at teachers for failing to rise up against the leadership. One comment even accused teachers of being child abusers because we give tests.

Of the dozen or so readers who attacked me for rejecting this so-called challenge, some of the Opters were clearly new to this blog.

Some have known me for many years.

It is simply dishonest for someone like Susan Ohanian to lecture me about the failings of union leadership when she knows that I have battled the union leadership over these issues for many decades.

When I stand at the microphone at state and union meetings, challenging the leadership on issues like Senate Bill 7 here in Illinois, a bill supported by the IEA and  which takes away teacher tenure, seniority, undermined Chicago teachers’ right to strike and tied teacher evaluations to students test scores, nobody from Opt Out was standing there with us. No Susan Ohanian.

There were only union members from my Region.

Union members.

Other Opters, who may not have read this blog before:  It is intellectually lazy to make assumptions about this blog and this blogger when all you had to do is to scroll down a few posts to know the nature of this blog, what it supports and what is opposes.

Or the Opter who wrote a comment about the cowardice of teachers and then signed their comment, “anonymous.”

Perhaps embarrassed by their anti-unionism after first threatening jubilant eradication of our union, the Opters soon tried to change the subject to whether rank-and-file union members should struggle against unresponsive or corrupt leadership. A bogus non-argument, since this blog has always loudly advocated for that and many of us have been at it for years from the inside, not the sidelines.

I support the FairTest statement, also supported by the NEA, on the dangers of standardized testing.

If there are delegates who feel this is not strong enough and want to present another document, bring it up.

But if the Opters have another agenda, and have joined with the long list of groups who want to see the teacher union movement destroyed, or try to threaten teachers because they may not agree with you on the wording of one resolution over another?

 Walk on by.

5 Comments leave one →
  1. June 30, 2012 7:28 am

    Funny I found a facebook group here claiming to be comprised of disgruntled Buffalo teachers who desire change. They even use a little apple with a big rotten spot as an avatar. Nowhere in their little group can one find a name to go with the foul wind emanating from their toxic little band. I did find a some comments from a few old war horses who have attempted lame palace coups against our long time president. They had little to go on and little cred and were trounced in the elections as one might expect. The irksome part to me is that some newer teachers thinking this was a legit operation could be seen popping off and/or trying to get their own 2 cents in for the cause of disunity and divisiveness. None of them will show themselves and when I invited them with the best locker room language I could muster to step forward and own up to their remarks they deleted my comments and fixed me from making any more. I suspect they are al least partly comprised of charter school agitators looking to sow some discontent cheap and easy. If there are any simple rules for internet sleuthing in such cases I think rule number one is get names. I think your blog title proves my point. Anyone lurking in the shadows too chicken to say who they are needs to be taken with a huge grain of salt. Loving your stuff here.

  2. June 30, 2012 5:46 pm

    Thank you for your voice on this, Fred. I agree, wholeheartedly.

  3. July 1, 2012 2:10 pm

    Fred is a sore loser… on the losing side, strategicially speaking, with regards to how this war against ed deform will be won and he cant admit he’s wrong….

    • Fred Klonsky permalink*
      July 1, 2012 2:25 pm

      I’m sorry. Have we met?

    • Cynthia Sloan permalink
      July 1, 2012 4:52 pm

      Fred is no loser in my book. He is an incredibly hard worker and fearless fighter for teachers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,222 other followers

%d bloggers like this: