Rauner’s state of the State and pensions.


Graphic: Crain’s.

There was tons of stuff in Governor Rauner’s state of the State address yesterday to be disgusted with.

He pitted working people against taxpayers as if they were different constituencies. As if taxpayers were people other than the working families that include union families.

Greg Hinz:

In Illinois, the lowest-earning 20 percent paid 13.2 percent of their income in total state and local taxes, but the top 1 percent paid just 4.6 percent. That’s a 9.6 percentage-point difference.

Rauner had very little to say about pensions.

“…as a first step toward bipartisan compromise, President Cullerton and I have agreed to support his pension proposal that will save $1 billion/year from four of the state pension plans.”

So far the Cullerton pension proposal has been more smoke than legislation.

The word is that the Senate President plan includes resurrecting the choice component of his failed SB2404 in which current state employees would choose between lower salaries or lower cost of living adjustments in retirement.

To be clear, this won’t pass constitutional muster.

The courts, including the Illinois Supreme Court, have ruled that employees are covered by contract law and the Illinois Constitution from the day the employee makes their first pension contribution.

The courts, including the Illinois Supreme Court, have ruled that pension benefits may not be diminished or impaired.

The Illinois Supreme Court unanimously said that a crisis created by the state legislature, as is the current $110 billion pension liability, cannot be an excuse for ignoring the pension protection clause of the state’s constitution.

They have ruled that a choice is not a choice if it is made under duress.

The facts are that even if Rauner were to withdraw his union-busting provisions from Cullerton’s pension theft proposal, it will not survive a court challenge.

The liability will continue to grow.

And without a change in the way the state raises revenue by placing a greater responsibility on those who are rich, the taxpayers and the workers – including union workers – will pay the price.

One Reply to “Rauner’s state of the State and pensions.”

  1. We also get less in federal money than all of those other states for Medicaide. This is years of poor leadership at the state and local and federal level. Nextbtime durbin opes his mouth ask him why Texas gets 60 % on medicaide and we get 50 . We are not a rich state like California or wall street.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s