Random thoughts. Union leadership conspiracy theories.

RANDOM

Don’t go to a state or national union convention thinking there will be real debate or democracy. As a delegate to a state convention one year I needed a bright orange sweater and my whole region waving their arms around behind me for the state president to recognize me at a microphone. At last year’s national meeting we had a two hour debate about the Confederate flag, the result being that my item passed and was filed in a deep dark hole somewhere, never to be seen or heard from again.

Union democracy. Frequently an oxymoron.

AFT President Randi Weingarten is a lawyer, so she knows how to use rhetorical devices.

When I made note on Facebook of her approving repost of a hack piece (The Right Baits the Left to Turn Against Hillary Clinton) from the New York Times suggesting the Bernie Sanders campaign was a conservative conspiracy to deprive Hillary Clinton of her earned nomination, she responded, “Fred-so when you disagree you call someone a hack?”

Nope. I call a hack a hack. Most of those I disagree with I call wrong or right. Or when I disagree with my wife, honey.

The problem with our union leadership is that they have a hard time with those they disagree with. Every difference among the membership is treated as if it were a conspiracy to destroy our unions.

Randi continued:

“I can’t believe you don’t want to know how the right manipulates us… We know how they do it overtly, but this is an astonishing example of how they do it covertly.”

See. Those supporting Sanders are just being manipulated. It’s not as if there are real issues here.

Is that why there was no rank-and-file input into the early, no-strings endorsement by the NEA and the AFT of Hillary?

In our short exchange I told Randi, “Nobody doubts games are played, but the assumption of this article and your comments suggest that the nomination is rightfully Clinton’s and that differences in policy and program exist in the Democratic Party because of a right-wing plot that created a progressive opposition to Clinton’s centrist corporate politics. Nonsense. These differences have always existed in the Democratic Party. Let them play out instead of treating it as if it were all a conspiracy. It should have been a debate in the AFT and the NEA. But that debate was shut down as well.

 

2 thoughts on “Random thoughts. Union leadership conspiracy theories.

  1. Hillery made 2.9 million $ for speaking to big banks. When asked about it she said because they offered it(the money) to her. Would that answer be treated the same way if the money was paid by the KKK or NAMBLA?

  2. Randi sat with Diane Ravitch during last year’s Network for Public Education Conference in Chicago in the Drake Hotel answering questions. When asked if the AFT would continue to accept Bill Gates’ funding, Randi said, “No.”
    The crowd in attendance roared its approval.
    A few days later, the AFT distributed a press release that explained that her “N0” was misunderstood and meant that the AFT would indeed accept Gates’ money. No meant yes.
    The interview video was removed from the NPE Conference website.
    Later in the year Randi endorsed Hillary based upon what her AFT membership had approved. Her membership had not been surveyed regarding the endorsement of Hillary.
    Randi now releases this right wing plot with poor, exploited teachers being taken in by Bernie shilling for billionaires to undermine votes for Hillary.
    Randi has lost all credibility.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s