Scalia’s failed heart preserved union fair share. It didn’t bring democracy to our unions. Only the members will do that.

Antonin-Scalia-2

When the right-wing Justice Antonin Scalia’s failed heart ended his life it also ended any chance that the Supreme Court would have an anti-union majority in the Friedrichs case.

Today the Court announced their 4-4 split decision. A split decision preserves agency fees for public employee unions.

The suit, funded by wealthy union-haters, was intended to deny teachers and other public employee unions the right  to collect dues, or an equivalent fee from those who didn’t want to join.

If Friedrichs went the other way, a free ride would be the law of the land.

Some employees would receive all the benefits of a union contract without having to pay for the work others did to bargain it. Eventually, the union-bashers figured, it would starve the union.

Folks, frustrated by the corruption, ineptness and deafness of much of what passes for union leadership these days, suggested that perhaps a union loss in Friedrichs would actually be a good thing. It might be just what the unions needed to get back to organizing and genuine collective bargaining.

It would force them to earn the right to represent the employees.

But I don’t think so.

A win for Friedrichs may well have destroyed what is left of public employee unions in a country with the lowest unionized workforce in the industrialized world.

Scalia’s failed heart may have sided with the unions and preserved fair share.

But it won’t bring democracy to public employee unions.

That will be up to the members.

2 thoughts on “Scalia’s failed heart preserved union fair share. It didn’t bring democracy to our unions. Only the members will do that.

  1. Yet Scalia passed Citizens United when shareholders disagreed with corporate donations stating that corporations shouldn’t speak for them politically. Court stated that shareholders could donate to their causes as well privately and corporations are people with free speech rights. So why can’t Union members and fair sharers be subject to the same logic?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s