Steve Bannon is a bigot in the White House. The Illinois Labor Relations Board just shot a bullet into the heart of collective bargaining.


“Never say ‘impasse’,” our IEA Uniserv Director always warned us when we bargained with our school board.

He said it so often that we would joke about it.

During breaks, mostly after hours and hours of bargaining, acting goofy from too much pizza, candy bars and bad coffee, someone might silently mouth the word. Or say, “in pass,” or “imp ass.”

Our UD didn’t find it funny.

But it’s not really funny. That is because the way collective bargaining rules are set up – a way that not surprisingly favors management – the bosses can make a “last, best and final offer.” Then bargaining ends and the union can take it or leave it.

That is an impasse.

Last year Governor Rauner vetoed a bill that would have essentially prevented him from creating an impasse in his negotiations with AFSCME which represents state workers.

Madigan’s Democrats could not organize their members, which should have been a veto proof majority, to override the veto.

Yesterday the Illinois Labor Relations Board ruled that an impasse exists. AFSCME, concerned about both their members and the citizens of Illinois who they serve, want to continue to bargain and not strike.

Rauner’s last, best and final offer to the 38,000 state workers  includes a four-year wage freeze and a 100 percent increase in employee health insurance costs.

The ruling rejects recommendations by an administrative law judge in September who said an impasse existed on some contract issues – including privatization – but not on the issues of a pay increase or health insurance benefits. She recommended the two sides return to the bargaining table on those. She found the administration did not provide information to the union, such as savings from changes to health care, that the union needed for bargaining.

“If the state were able to implement its entire last, best and final offer, the implications and impact would be so enormous that, when applied to this case, it would be destructive of the collective bargaining process and not serve the statutory mission of the board,” Sarah Kerley wrote in her recommendation to the labor board.

The ruling fires a bullet into the heart of collective bargaining.

AFSCME says they will appeal the ruling.

6 Replies to “Steve Bannon is a bigot in the White House. The Illinois Labor Relations Board just shot a bullet into the heart of collective bargaining.”

  1. It also seems that Rauner is pushing “managed competition” which is privatization. Union services would be put out to bid. Now one would think that would lead to the savings. But Rauner refused to accept language stating that bids from private contractors would have to “meet the standard of greater efficiency, economy, or other related factors”. Without this language the state could accept any bid they want handing out contracts costing taxpayers much more lining the pockets of his cronies.
    This is Rauner. Break the unions.

  2. I want to add that it is about corrupt contracting because the studies have shown little to no savings. Let me explain why it would cost more now. State employees are teir 2 now. Utilities and health care are purchased in bulk that no contractor could ever do.

  3. If you are SURS University not community college it’s judge your premiums deductibles and co pays will double.Perhaps back to July.Not fully clear is retiree but the test run for more pension theft…There may be an option to have no raise in health premium of you drop your retiree health care.

  4. A telling sentence, “Madigan’s Democrats could not organize their members, which should have been a veto proof majority, to override the veto.”
    Are “Madigan’s Democrats” Demopubs? Demoncrats?
    Was this accidentally on purpose?
    WHO in Springfield is fighting for the working class?
    ILL-annoy~the State of Chaos.

  5. You mean like Spectre Jack? I would like the UK to send James Bond to save us from these villains.btw the British system looks better. The Queen could intervene if some lunatic like Nigel Farage actually won.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s