Betsy DeVos and the Prince of darkness.



So the next Secretary of Education doesn’t know what the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is.

She thinks schools should have guns in case of Grizzley bears.

I have to admit that I found Al Franken’s gotcha on the debate over growth scores and competency a little confusing myself. I get that it showed that Betsy DeVos has little knowledge of school jargon. But, I mean, what was the past administration’s position on this alleged debate?

Given the time allotted, the Committee’s Democrats did the best they could to undermine the inevitable Secretary of Education.

I found myself wondering: Where was this sharp grilling when Arne Duncan was sitting before them? In so many ways, he set the groundwork on charters and privatization where Betsy will now try and take us.

But for those who opposed Arne Duncan on the basis that his Department exemplified too much federal control, we will now get Betsy “Let-the-states-decide” Devos.

Make America state’s rights again.

This will not be good news for parents of special needs children who depended on federal mandates, often weakly enforced and underfunded – but still there.

Watching the hearings I skipped my plan to begin watching season four of Shameless.

As it turned out, Shameless was exactly what I was watching.

What could be worse news than Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Eduction?

Jeremy Scahill reports that Betsy’s brother Erik Prince of Blackwater fame is now a close advisor to President-elect Trump.

Prince’s sister, Betsy DeVos, is Trump’s nominee for education secretary and she has all but vowed to embark on a crusade to push a privatization and religious agenda in education that mirrors her brother’s in military and CIA affairs. Prince has long been a contributor to the campaign of fellow Christian warrior Mike Pence, and he contributed $100,000 to the pro-Trump Super PAC Make America Number 1. Prince’s mother, Elsa, pitched in another $50,000. That organization, run by Rebekah Mercer, daughter of billionaire hedge funder Robert Mercer, was one of the strongest bankrollers of Trump’s campaign.

According to New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, in December Prince attended the annual “Villains and Heroes” costume ball hosted by Mercer. Dowd wrote that Palantir founder Peter Thiel showed her “a picture on his phone of him posing with Erik Prince, who founded the private military company Blackwater, and Mr. Trump — who had no costume — but joke[d] that it was ’N.S.F.I.’ (Not Safe for the Internet).”

Not even Trump is brazen enough to give Prince a public post in his administration. But Prince is operating in the shadows, where he has always been most at home.

There will be no Senate confirmation hearing of Erik Prince.


8 thoughts on “Betsy DeVos and the Prince of darkness.

  1. The image is great, Fred (& so sadly accurate). What a (sad) hoot that, when Tim Kaine asked her if she’d ever been anything in a public school (after he pointedly asked her if she’d ever attended public school, sent her children to public schools, or worked as an educator in public schools {no, no &, naturally, no}, she answered that she’d been a mentor (really–& in a PUBLIC school {in Michigan, where she helped DESTROY public schools}?!)
    I’d say that your impostor poster will make a great poster for future marches/protests/demonstrations. Could you create a prototype that we could have printed?

  2. Although I was aware of her relations to Eric, just reading this will add more sleepless nights to the ones I’ve already had.

  3. SOS
    Public schools provide opportunities for all. What is “taught” and how it is “measured” is public knowledge. The potential for controversy as regards public schools is a fact. A hallmark of the United States democracy mandates the actions by public school teachers be observed and subject to criticism.
    As the United States inaugurates the 45th President of the United States,The attached, written by a public school teacher, is important for all citizens to consider.
    Yours in education,
    Dr. Charles W. Birch, public school teacher
    Teachers’ Moral Imperative to Challenge Political Hatred
    Politicians must be held to standards of human decency
    By Lucas Jacob
    November 29, 2016
    Every high school teacher can count on being asked his or her opinion on some political matter during the course of any given semester. Teenagers are curious, and they spend more time with their teachers than with almost any other adults in their lives—sometimes even more than with their parents or guardians.
    It is usually a simple matter, if not an easy one, to follow the (often unwritten) rule about not unduly influencing young people’s developing worldviews by taking obvious political stances in class or in one-on-one conversations with kids. I have for years told my students, truthfully, that I have continued to read The Washington Post long after moving away from the Washington area largely because of how conveniently the Post is structured for the reading of opposing political viewpoints. The paper’s stable of opinion writers runs the gamut of backgrounds and predispositions. I encourage students to find a similar, intentionally structured way of encountering the ideas of people who have differing ways of looking at the world.
    Can students infer some of my political opinions nonetheless, from the texts I choose to teach or the questions I choose to ask or the pop-culture references I appear to understand? Sure. That’s true of young people’s interactions with all adults. But normally I can, with the rest of my peers in the profession, not only do everything in my power to avoid telling students what or how to think, but also manage not to appear to be unduly critical of any given political candidate or office-holder.
    Through the turmoil of this year’s national election season and into the future, the normal rules of not appearing to take political sides still apply, but they are being misapplied any time anyone suggests that Donald Trump’s public statements must not be parsed, let alone criticized, within the walls of a school.
    Calling a politician out for Islamophobia, xenophobia, racism, and misogyny is not a matter of exerting undue influence by favoring one political party over another; nor is it a matter of disrespecting the presidency. Naming Mr. Trump’s hate speech as such is, rather, a moral imperative for supporting the missions of K-12 schools, in which Islamophobic, xenophobic, racist, and misogynist words and actions are punishable offenses that can (and must) be treated as being beyond the pale.
    “National figures must be held to the same standards of basic human decency as are the children we teach.”
    The first job of a school is to be a safe place for children. Even if the person saying inflammatory things is the president-elect—especially in such a case—the adults in schools must stand together to defend the identities of our students.
    Schools do not allow identity-based attacks between or among students, and teachers work hard to help students to understand the difference between differing with someone’s ideas and attacking that person’s identity. Schools risk rank hypocrisy if a major-party nominee for the presidency, a president-elect, or even a sitting president, is held to a different standard under the guise of “balance.” The same standard applies to all nominees and elected officials from all parties in all elections.
    Recall Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s reference to many Trump supporters as “deplorables”: While a comment on someone’s behavior or words is not the same thing as a comment on that person’s identity, insofar as she could be inferred to be targeting groups of people based on, say, their shared socioeconomic status, race, or access to postsecondary education, Secretary Clinton deserved to be called out. This kind of distinction is precisely what we should be considering in our schools—and it’s precisely the kind that separates so many of Mr. Trump’s statements about people’s identities from so much other political speech.
    Visit Opinion.
    One of the formative moments in my own political awakening was in 1984, when the Rev. Jesse Jackson—a local Chicago icon whose Rainbow/PUSH headquarters were just a few miles from my childhood home—used an unquestionably anti-Semitic slur in referring to New York City as “Hymietown.” Condemnations came from adults all around me, of all political stripes, and of all racial and ethnic backgrounds. I noticed this. The Rev. Jackson was certainly not given a pass because of his political prominence as an aspirant to the Democratic presidential nomination.
    I have already begun to hear whisperings about the need for school employees to be careful not to appear to be criticizing President Trump for his past—or future—words during these next four years. This is dangerous nonsense. National figures must be held to the same standards of basic human decency as are the children we teach. Attacks on identity must always be condemned in our schools.
    Lucas Jacob is a writer and a teacher at La Jolla Country Day School, in California. For two decades, he has worked in K-12 schools across the United States and in Budapest, Hungary, where he was a Fulbright Teaching Exchange Fellow.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s