Park Ridge parents and community pack board meeting. “It’s not his use of the word vagina but his saying he didn’t like it when women spoke up for their rights.”

img_8449-1485025567-5190

Many Park Ridge parents, teachers and students joined Saturday’s Chicago rally and marches.

From the Daily Herald:

Board President Anthony Borrelli distanced the board from Paterno’s statements and said they would look into changing their policies so something like this doesn’t happen again.

“While unfortunate, we should take the time to learn and reinforce our ideas of respect and civility,” Borrelli said Monday night before public comment. “These are qualities that we teach our children and qualities that we should retain as adults.”

Paterno has come under fire for controversial tweets in the past. Blogger Fred Klonsky, a retired teacher from Chicago who writes about education issues, has cataloged several statements he’s attributed to Paterno’s Twitter and Facebook accounts, including anti-Muslim statements, claims Christians who support abortion rights are “hailing Satan,” and frequent criticisms of the Obama administration.

District parent Stacy Kelly said she found it hard to believe that the other members of the board weren’t aware of Paterno’s online behavior before his tweets over the weekend and called for an independent review of the board so the behavior will no longer go unchecked.

“If you are neutral in the face of injustice you are choosing the side of the aggressor,” Kelly said.

Perhaps the most dramatic moment during the almost hourlong public comment came when board member Athan Sotos interrupted district parent Daisy Bowe because she, like several other speakers, used the word “vagina” in her remarks. Sotos said he denounced Paterno’s use of the word and he didn’t want to have to explain to his children why people at the board meeting also used the word.

The crowd shouted down Sotos’ interjections. And when he continued to talk over Bowe, Superintendent Laurie Heinz asked Sotos to stop talking because public comment was not meant to be a dialogue between the public and the board.

A few speakers later, district parent Sarah Nugent told Sotos that what was objectionable about Paterno’s tweets was not his use of the word “vagina” but his saying he didn’t like it when women spoke up for their rights.

After public comment ended Monday night, Heinz said she appreciated so many coming to the meeting and asked them to remember the good that the district does.

“We will not let this incident define the school, the staff, or the district because we deserve better,” Heinz said, her voice cracking with emotion.

Borrelli said in the coming days the board will put application materials for the now-vacant seat on the school board on the district’s website.

5 thoughts on “Park Ridge parents and community pack board meeting. “It’s not his use of the word vagina but his saying he didn’t like it when women spoke up for their rights.”

  1. Well done Superintendent, and well done Fred for helping document past bizarre, inappropriate and unacceptable comments. My only question is why didn’t the school board chair, rather than the supt, tell the board member to stop interrupting a parent? Isn’t the school board chair supposed to run the meeting? This is not a criticism of the supt, but it’s a question for this and other board chairs. You, board chairs ultimately are responsible for running meetings

    • Board President Anthony Borelli, board member Dathan Paterno and Superintendent Laurie Heinz all came to Park Ridge District 64 after I retired and was no longer union president. But from what my friends and former colleagues tell me, how this board runs things is a mystery to all. For example, Borelli and Paterno have always been an informal bloc on most questions and policies. And when did Laurie Heinz first hear about Paterno’s offensive tweets. He’s been posting them for years. Many, as I documented as far back as 2013, were actually worse than the vagina screechers tweet. I am not as impressed by Superintendent Heinz as you.

      • Thanks for this explanation. I’m not making an overall endorsement of the supt. I’m just saying that I think it’s good someone intervened, since the board chair did not.

  2. Well a good start, though very late. One has to call out bullshit whenever and where ever one comes across it. We should be tolerant but not tolerant of this type of behavior. We should never tolerate the abuse of those values we see as basic to one’s humanity.

  3. Thanks for being vigilant and documenting the offensive remarks. Its rather shameful that this behavior was alowed to continue unabated until now. Let’s hope this incident will serve as a clarion call to a new slate of progressive candidates to run and win future open seats on that board.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s