Why is AFSCME Rauner’s #1 labor target? Black workers matter.

 

bruce-almightyGovernor Bruce Rauner wants an excuse to fire unionized state workers.

He is wants a strike. He has been provoking a strike.

At this moment, AFSCME members are voting on strike authorization.

Rauner has refused to bargain for over a year. He says he has made his last, best and final offer.

AFSCME leadership repeatedly has called for renewed negotiations. They have already conceded much to avoid harm to those  that rely on state services. AFSCME has proposed a deal where members would receive no general wage increases for four years, pay modestly more for health insurance, and continue to negotiate on all other issues.

Rauner administration has refused to even meet with the union bargaining committee.

 Instead, the governor is pushing to unilaterally impose terms on AFSCME members—including a 100% increase in employee costs for health care and an end to standards that prevent irresponsible outsourcing—unlike those accepted by any other union in state government.

He has no interest in pursuing collective bargaining.

Why is the Governor targeting AFSCME?

Aside from his basic hatred for organized public employees that is.

There is this.

Rauner’s refusal to negotiate with the largest union of state employees threatens disproportionate harm to communities of color in the Chicago area and to Black, Latino and female state employees.

They are not Rauner’s people, so they don’t matter.

This morning Black and Latino state senators and representatives and state workers represented by AFSCME will be holding a press conference on the harmful impact of Gov. Rauner’s treatment of the union representing the largest share of people of color and women in state government.

The press conference will take place at the James. R. Thompson State of Illinois Center, 15th Floor press room at 11AM.

One Reply to “Why is AFSCME Rauner’s #1 labor target? Black workers matter.”

  1. Sixty-two percent of Chicago families are financially insecure, meaning they have less than $2,000 in savings, according to a new report. This can lead to trouble recovering from a financial emergency or job loss, but it can also directly impact city budgets.

    Chicago was among 10 cities studied in the report published late last month by the Urban Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank.

    The group’s research found that Chicago’s financial insecurity is 9 percent higher than the national average. And the cost of eviction, unpaid property taxes and utility bills cost the city of Chicago a minimum of $68 million in 2016. Though this sum makes up less than 1 percent of the city’s $7.7 billion budget, it has ripple effects that extend to the community at large.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s