Pritzker’s pension plans. A gift to Illinois Republicans.

Screen Shot 2019-04-24 at 8.06.47 AM

Has the Illinois Republican Party now become the defenders of public employee pensions?

Of course not.

But Democratic Party Governor JB Pritzker has thrown them a big old softball pitch to swing at with his plans for public employee pensions.

In the words of the great bard, Pete Seeger – whose 100th birthday we celebrate next week – when will they ever learn.

The road to so-called pension reform is littered with the road kill of Democrats who thought cutting contractual and guaranteed pension benefits could be done without a cost to their political lives.

Governor Pat Quinn. Representative Elaine Nekritz. Senator Dan Biss. Cook County board President Toni Preckwinkle.

Should I go on?

Pritzker’s proposal includes extending the repayment ramp by seven years, cutting somewhere around a million dollars a year in state payments and hoping that a future graduated income tax will provide an increase in the revenue stream for pensions.

Of course none of these proposals address the unfunded 133.4 billion dollar pension liability.

Pension holidays. A  holiday is what Illinois politicians call failure to pay what they owe. It is one of the things that got us into this mess in the first place.

The ramp is what they call the repayment schedule of the unfunded liability while skipping payments. It is not the same a reamortizing the liability which would increase the payments up front rather than delaying repayment by seven years.

The TRS board of trustees recently criticized the Governor’s plan.

“The system is at a growing risk of insolvency in the event of an economic downturn. This danger is the direct result of eight decades of state contributions that always have fallen far short of actuarially based funding. TRS long-term investment returns consistently exceed the system’s expectations; but investment income alone will not be enough to prevent insolvency.”

The problem for Illinois Democrats is that they are seen by many public employees as the Party of pension theft.

It was Democratic Party Chairman and Speaker of the Illinois House, Michael Madigan who led Democrats in creating Tier II and in passing the bill that cut retirement benefits.

That bill was challenged in court and ruled unconstitutional in a unanimous ruling of the Illinois Supreme Court.

Pritzker ran as a pro-working people’s candidate. After 100 days in office, he still claims to be one.

To some degree, Pritzker has done good. He wants credit for raising the state’s minimum wage. He wants credit for passing anti-right to work legislation. He is pushing for a graduated income tax.

He’s not Bruce Rauner.

But as long as his proposals for pensions include things like more pension holidays, he runs the risk of solidifying the Illinois Democratic Party’s brand as the Party of pension theft.

Handing the ILGOP a gift.

6 thoughts on “Pritzker’s pension plans. A gift to Illinois Republicans.

  1. They should make the required pension payments. Period. If they do not make the payments, they are crooks. That is true whether they are Democrats or Republicans.

  2. Fred, Check out, Amy Grant’s website. Yesterday she sent out a spring survey and the mailing had a reference to her new website. Grant took the place of Jeanne Ives as representative. She is a winger and sneaky. The take she is selling on Pritzker’s Fair Tax is interesting as well. Republicans are lying about that and definitely using the pension holiday as evidence of a budgeting trick. Pat Herrmann

    Sent from my iPad


  3. Put the shoe on another foot. What happens to an individual when he/she takes a “payment holiday” on their VISA card for a several months? Eventually the card holder will be denied the ability to use the card. But the past due payments will still be there along with some high interest late fees that keep accumulating month after month. A whole nightmare of legal proceedings will soon follow. The cardholder eventually becomes the financial slave of the lender.

    This too, is what awaits the many young individuals who cannot pay their student loans.

  4. Just think what would happen if all the residents had decided to take a holiday from paying our state income tax.for eight decades? How’d that work out for the powers to be of either party? Of course there’d be legal recourse as mentioned in the previous comment, but just saying.

  5. STILL not listening to Martire/C.T.B.A.? Why not? Interesting that the equity, evidence-based school funding bill passed last summer (&, no, it wound up NOT shifting property taxes from wealthy districts, so it is a largely unfunded bill, funded, thus far, only by money from programs cut or taking money from formerly dedicated funds {special education} & placing that money into the general education pool).
    And–no small fact–this bill was pushed by such groups as Advance ILL-Annoy & Stand on Children.
    If we do get a Fair Tax (& the ads say that those w/income $250K & above will be taxed–these days, $250K is too low; why that #?), that new revenue should support educational funding, but we’ll see…

  6. But the Republicans are hardly going to emerge as the champions of Illinois pensioners, so Pritzker feels quite safe in his ill-handling of our pension funds. How did Pete Seeger put it?

    Sent from my iPhone


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s