The Israel loyalty oath. Teachers in Texas. Pensions in Chicago and Illinois.

Screen Shot 2019-07-20 at 12.12.31 PM.png

Ilhan Omar, the courageous Congress member from Minnesota, has introduced a bill affirming that Americans have the right to participate in economic boycotts for political purposes.

The legislation doesn’t specifically mention the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, but the BDS movement (which some free speech deniers want to make advocating for a crime), would be covered.

House Resolution 496  asserts that boycotts “have been effectively used in the United States by advocates for equal rights since the Boston Tea Party and include boycotts led by civil rights activists during the 1950s and 1960s in order to advocate for racial equality, such as the Montgomery bus boycott, and promote workers’ rights, such as the United Farm Workers-led boycott of table grapes.”

It also identifies historical moments when Americans participated in boycotts to push human rights in other countries: the boycotting of Imperial Japan during the late 1930s, the boycotting of Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1941, the boycotting of the 1980 summer Olympics in Moscow, and the boycotting of South Africa.

Omar’s bill currently has two cosponsors: Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Rep. John Lewis (D-GA).

Omar’s bill comes in the wake of a law requiring Texas teachers to sign a loyalty oath to Israel.

In 2015 the Illinois legislature passed a bill that calls for our public pension funds to disinvest in any companies participating in an economic boycott of Israel.

I pointed out at the time the irony of a legislative body that has consistently underfunded our pension system using the funds for political purposes.

But the bill was passed unanimously.

So was a similar bill in the Chicago City Council.


Once again, thank you Congress member Omar for understanding what the first amendment means. Sometimes even our most progressive legislators seem to forget.

2 thoughts on “The Israel loyalty oath. Teachers in Texas. Pensions in Chicago and Illinois.

  1. Thank goodness for two legislative bodies! I am looking forward to the Senate voting down this resolution. We already have freedom of speech in the United States. Liberal and progressive democrats along with liberal media (news, tweeter, face book, etc.) have continually tried to silence our voices. Omar is not a hero, she has voiced her disdain for the United States and it”s people.

  2. In what universe do you think it is right for a government body to tell us how we are to feel about Israel? Just why is it that I should sign a loyalty oath to Israel? How does that represent freedom of speech? I am given the right to protest the actions of my own government, but I have to sign a loyalty oath to another? Neither Israel or the Palestinians can claim innocence in this ongoing and never ending conflict, and I would not like the job of coming to some kind of workable solution that would probably require compromise on both sides. No one, however, should be required to give up the right to examine the issues from more than an official point of view.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s