“I don’t oppose all wars,” State Senator Barack Obama said in October 2002. “What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war.”
Bombing a country to stop bombing a country is a dumb war.
Dumb wars kill people.
Andy Borowitz wrote satirically in yesterday’s New Yorker:
Attempting to quell criticism of his proposal for a limited military mission in Syria, President Obama floated a more modest strategy today, saying that any U.S. action in Syria would have “no objective whatsoever.”
Satire became reality in today’s New York Times:
“The kind of attack the administration appears to be planning will demonstrate to Syria and to others that there is a cost the United States is willing to impose for crossing clearly established American red lines and violating widely held international norms,” said Richard Fontaine, the president of the Center for a New American Security, a centrist research center.
But, he said, “It probably will do very little to alter the fundamental balance of forces on the ground or hasten the end of the conflict.”
Bombing people to restore a blurry red line.
From Glen Brown:
On Syria/Remembering “Shock and Awe”
“America, the richest and most powerful nation in the world, can well lead the way in this revolution of values. There is nothing, except a tragic death wish, to prevent us from reordering our priorities, so that the pursuit of peace will take precedence over the pursuit of war. There is nothing to keep us from molding a recalcitrant status quo with bruised hands until we have fashioned it into a brotherhood.” – Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. A Time to Break the Silence, April 4th, 1967.
The Chicago Moral Monday Coalition, an alliance of Chicago clergy, lay people, unions and community organizations protested yesterday, Monday, at the Palmer House, 17 E. Monroe. The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is slated to meet at the hotel this Wednesday for its 40th annual national conference. The Coalition is demanding that the Palmer House rescind its invitation to ALEC. Numerous coalition members were arrested.
Moral Monday Coalition partners include local clergy and laypeople, Chicago Teachers Union (CTU), National Nurses United (NNU), US Uncut, Chicago Youth Climate Coalition, Chicago Fracking Working Group, Communities United Against Foreclosures and Evictions, Young People’s Assembly on Violence and Youth Services Project, Southside Together Organizing for Power (STOP)
A large demonstration against ALEC is planned for Thursday at noon.
See you there.
We were driving back from a demonstration of hundreds of thousands that had gathered on the Washington DC mall. Hundreds of thousands more had protested in cities all around the world. Over a million people in the streets.
Ten years ago.
As we drove home to Chicago I read aloud the report of the protest in the NY Times to the others in the car.
The Times began their report with, “There are two superpowers in the world this morning: The United States and world public opinion.”
We were elated.
Like so much of what The Times wrote about Iraq and the lead up to the war that started ten years ago today, they were wrong about that too.
George Bush would not be deterred by millions of people saying, “No war.”
Last night, the great Indian writer and activist Arundhati Roy asked a lecture hall full of people in Chicago, who had won and who had lost the war?
The people of Iraq have not won. Not the American people either.
George Bush spends his days painting bad paintings of himself in the shower.
Tony Blair has become a Christian evangelist who charges $500,000 a speech.
I remember getting into a discussion with a young man in a Bucktown restaurant ten years ago.
“We’ll wrap this thing up in a few days,” he assured me.
I shook my head. I was old enough to have seen all this before. “Years,” I said. “Urban warfare. House by house. Thousands will die.”
“No way,” he assured me.
I like to play a self-serving game with people called Who’s the most famous person you ever met?
Self-serving, because I know I will win.
It always starts the same.
First I have to define what met means.
It doesn’t mean be in the same room. Or see from a distance.
You have to have shaken hands or exchanged words.
It’s all a sham, of course. Because in 1967 I met the most famous person in the whole world.
I was at an anti-war demonstration at the Century City Hotel in Los Angeles.
On June 23, 1967, President Lyndon Johnson was attending a $500-a-plate fundraising dinner at the hotel, nestled between Beverly Hills and Westwood. That afternoon thousands of us gathered at nearby Cheviot Hills Park for a march through Century City and then to the hotel to protest the Vietnam War. The pre-march rally was like a summer festival, vendors selling hot dog and young people flying kites. Anti-war celebrities like Benjamin Spock and H. Rap Brown spoke to the crowd before we began marching in the early evening peacefully up the Avenue of the Stars towards the Hotel.
While walking around the park I spotted a smaller crowd gathered around Muhammad Ali. Ali had been stripped of his championship for refusing to be inducted into the Army to fight a war in violation of his religious beliefs.
I pushed my way through the crowd, pulled out my wallet, found my draft card and grabbed a pen out of somebody’s hand. “Mr. Ali. Would you sign my draft card?” I asked.
And he did.
Later the demonstration of 20,000 was broken up violently by the Los Angeles Police Department in what became known in LA as the Century City Riots.
Ali turns 70 on Tuesday.
There is a good article in the LA Times today on Muhammad Ali by Dave Zirin.
I posted one of my photos of Illinois State Police from Sunday’s anti-NATO protest on Facebook yesterday. It provoked some passionate comments.
One was from a cop, my friend and former neighbor, Abraham.
Abraham did what you would expect most cops to do. He defended his buddies and his job.
What my friend Abraham doesn’t say is whether he was on duty yesterday at the NATO protest.
Or if he has traveled around the city these last few days like I have.
I was in Grant Park yesterday. There were thousands of people who looked pretty much like people I have been with at protests my entire life. If I said that there were a hundred Black Bloc anarchists, that would be an over-estimate.
A friend joked that you would confuse them for clerks at Hollisters.
More significant were the number of Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans who threw their medals over the security fence surrounding the NATO meeting Green Zone.
But Rahm and the fed’s security response was so out of whack compared to the actual situation that it is a metaphor for all that we were protesting.
Abraham and a dozen of his buddies could have controlled the crowd. There were far more bloodied heads than arrests and most of those arrested were released without charges.
Rahm’s priorities meant spending $30 million in preparation and security on the NATO meeting while closing neighborhood mental health clinics that cost the city $2.5 million a year.
Rahm’s priorities mean reducing library hours, cutting public service pensions, closing schools and provoking a teacher strike while giving tax breaks to Sears and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.
And then there is NATO itself. The only military alliance in the world, spending 70% of the world’s military budget. Most of the dollars coming from the US. Their war in Afghanistan is this country’s longest and is a NATO operation.
But Abraham is just a guy who grew up next door in Logan Square. His mom taught me how to make Puerto Rican arroz con gandules.
Look at the picture. It’s hard to see the Abrahams behind all that military hardware and robo-cop equipment. And it’s hard for those guys to see the people on the street through the plastic face masks.
That’s pretty much how the one percent want it.
The bridge over the Chicago River, 2003.
On the day the US invaded Iraq in 2003, Bush’s war against weapons of mass destruction that never existed, we headed down to the Federal Plaza to protest.
So did 20,000 other Chicago folks.
After the usual round of speeches that nobody listens to, the crowd surged down Jackson, headed for Lake Shore Drive. If somebody was in charge, we didn’t know who.
The crowd was spirited and angry. But peaceful.
Soon we were marching down Michigan Avenue. Young people were climbing on to the median pumping picket signs and chanting. Cars were honking their horns. Some in frustration at the stalled traffic. Some in solidarity. You couldn’t tell which was which.
Before long, the march was on Lake Shore Drive on the bridge that crosses the Chicago River.
I wasn’t too comfortable with this. A bridge over the river. The police had blocked the exit off the drive that takes you down to Grand. Nobody could get off. We were now corralled on the drive. Blocked at Michigan by another line of police. Blocked from getting off at the exit. The only way out was back into the crowd of thousands that was surging forward.
Certainly the police knew exactly what they were doing.
We did manage to circle back. But others were caught at Michigan and Walton. In response, some protesters sat in the street. Others tried to escape the blockade, but were prevented from doing so by the cops. Soon the arrests began, Among those arrested were people who happened to be walking by.
Today, the city agreed to a settlement of $6.2 million dollars in a class action suit. Those charged and detained will receive up to $15000.
The National Lawyers Guild, in conjunction with the People’s Law Office, worked on the case for nine years. The People’s Law Office said in a statement:
“Based on our collective experience litigating police misconduct cases for decades, we feel very positive about this settlement and about the amount of compensation for each sub-class member. We also believe that such a significant settlement will send an unequivocal message to the City of Chicago and its Police Department that they must respect your right to demonstrate.”The settlement isn’t only a victory for the participants in the class action suit, it also affects future demonstrations. According to the People’s Law Office, the court opinion holds that the City cannot arrest peaceful demonstrators without warning, solely because they do not have a permit, and will apply to future demonstrations. Rachael Perrotta, a member of the class action suit and current participant in Occupy Chicago, said “The last time the CPD faced huge protests, they violated the constitutional rights of over 700 people. If the CPD has the right to deputize police officers from other cities during the NATO/G8 summits, as well as private security, how will law enforcement be held accountable?”
Should this be viewed as a warning to Rahm and to how he might respond to the NATO and G8 protests next May?
I would think it should.
Won’t you please come to Chicago.