The petition to Governor Quinn that you signed is creeping up on 24,000 signatures! The response has been nothing short of amazing!
We currently have plans to present the signatures to Governor Quinn’s office on Friday, March 16, during the Representative Assembly of the Illinois Education Association — four short days away.
If you are a delegate to the IEA-RA and you want to help us — Save Our Pensions – PLEASE Contact me before the RA or at the RA….! (firstname.lastname@example.org – Bob Haisman)
So we are making one last push for signatures.
Here’s how you can help! Send an email to your friends asking them to sign the petition!
Instead of using the subject line “Governor Quinn: Please Do Not Cut Our Health Insurance”, send it to your siblings with the subject line “Governor Quinn: Please Do Not Cut My Sister’s Health Insurance”.
To your children use the subject line: “Governor Quinn: Please don’t cut my Mom’s Health Insurance!!!”
To your Teacher Friend (BOB) use the subject line: Governor –”Please don’t cut Bob’s health insurance!!”
Anything to make it more personal. Change the subject line to fit your needs, pass the email along to your teacher friends and colleagues, your relatives, your neighbors, ANYONE that cares about your well-being!
Don’t forget to include the link to the petition. SIGN HERE! http://signon.org/sign/governor-quinn-do-not?source=s.em.cr&r_by=2781010&mailing_id=2617
Together we can draw attention to this critical issue.
Thanks for all you do. Bob Haisman –email@example.com
If you are a delegate to the IEA-RA and want to help Save Our Pensions – PLEASE Contact me ASAP! (firstname.lastname@example.org – Bob Haisman)
Today on Capitol Hill, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform assembled a panel to discuss the birth control mandate in President Obama’s Affordable Care Act. Specifically, whether or not requiring insurers to cover birth control violates religious freedom of people who don’t believe in science. California Republican Darrell Issa chaired the panel. What’s wrong with this picture?
A study found that women hotel workers were 1.5 times more likely to suffer injuries than males. Injuries to Hispanic women hotel workers were double that of white women. Meanwhile, Asian and Hispanic male employee injuries were 1.5 times greater than whites.
Susan Buchanan, MD, of the University of Illinois Chicago School of Public Health, is the lead author of the study, presented at a recent meeting of the American Public Health Association in Philadelphia. “These alarming results raise many questions as to why injury rates are so high for women and Hispanic and Asian workers in the hotel sector,” she said.
Not surprsingly, the Chicago-based Hyatt Hotel chain dismissed the results of the study.
“While we take seriously all valid research regarding workplace safety, we have not had the opportunity to thoroughly review the data and design of the Unite Here study,” said Amy Patti, a Hyatt spokeswoman. “However, it is clear to us that the union’s conclusions are not consistent with the workplace environment in our hotels.”
John Wilhelm, the president of Unite Here, disagrees with Patti. “Hyatt, with the highest reported injury rate for housekeepers, needs to make changes immediately that will keep housekeepers safe and pain-free at work,” he said.
Unite Here’s labor contracts with Hyatt in Chicago and San Francisco ended in August. Union workers in San Francisco protested the stalled talks with a three-day strike before returning to work in November.
Every fifth employee in the study worked in housekeeping, and had the highest risk of being hurt, researchers found.
The Pritzker-owned Chicago-based Hyatt Hotels, which includes the Hyatt Rosemont where the IEA holds its annual state convention in the Spring, is one of the least safe places to work among the five major hotel chains.
A peer-reviewed study of 50 hotels in the United States suggests that Hyatt housekeepers are almost twice as likely to suffer on-the-job injuries as their Hilton counterparts. Looking at all hotel jobs, Hyatt places fourth for safety among the top five hospitality chains.
Francis Lewis High School teacher Arthur Goldstein sends this today. The story makes me more sad than angry. If you teach in NY City schools, you can help.
At Francis Lewis High School, we want to help our sick friend and the Department of Education has offered us a deal. They’ll let us give him our sick days under these terms — buy one, pay for two.
Our colleague is suffering from a nasty reoccurrence of cancer that requires a very aggressive treatment. His doctor has had good results with this treatment, but it entails weeks of hospitalization, and our friend will be out of commission for six months at the very least. During his first bout with this cancer, he exhausted his sick days, and ended up owing the DOE one sick day.
It’s true we have the option of donating our sick days so as to keep our friend on payroll and covered by health insurance. It’s good karma, help thy neighbor, the golden rule, or whatever you wish to call it. It’s as American as mom and apple pie. But a quirk in the city’s pay rules for teachers means our sick-day donations are seriously limited. It’s almost like the city opposes mom and apple pie.
The New York City Department of Education, to be fair, doesn’t precisely oppose it, but they don’t exactly support it either. Why, then, would I suggest they oppose mom and apple pie? For one thing, any red-blooded American mom would probably give you a full slice of pie. The DoE thinks mom is some wild-eyed extremist and is having no part of her or her nonsense.
So it’s too bad, mom, but for every two days donated, our colleague receives only one. Math teacher Angelo Vetrano (who suggested I write this) donated twenty sick days, but our colleague will receive only ten. Social studies teacher Brian Kellar, and guidance counselor Bryan Brown donated six days each, but our colleague gets six total.
Sure, it’s lucrative for the DOE to get two for one. Each time they do that, they profit. A substitute teacher costs $155 a day. But the DOE collects two days worth of real teacher pay, even more, for each day we give. So if my colleague gets the hundred (or so) days he needs, the DOE stands to save thousands. What are they going to do with that money? Will they demolish my trailer and create real classroom space for my kids? Will they use it to reduce the highest class sizes in the state?
After all, it isn’t as though they haven’t already received hundreds of millions of dollars to do precisely that. Why, then, do they need so badly to make pocket change off of our ailing friend? Why does anyone want to profit off his misery, particularly when the profit is, relatively, so small?
Here’s a chance for the chancellor to reach out and show what a good guy he is. It’s contract negotiation time, and that’s a perfect time to rectify this situation. I’m fairly certain no UFT member, from a lowly teacher like me right up to President Michael Mulgrew, would oppose direct contributions of sick days to ailing colleagues.
While they’re at it, why not lift restrictions on who can contribute? Current regulations state that members with fewer than 50 or more than 180 days cannot contribute at all. In a case like this, it’s hard to fathom why that’s productive. Particularly egregious is the latter restriction. Why penalize teachers for spending over 18 years without a sick day? Teachers who go over 20 without a sick day really lose out — in September any days over 200 simply disappear into the DOE Phantom Zone.
Linda Silverman donated six days, even though she’s not personally acquainted with our friend. As a math teacher, she understands fractions very well, so she’s not crazy about the rules. But she looks at it another way.
“Ultimately, it means nothing to me, and everything to him.”
It would be nice if Tweed adopted some fraction of the Silverman philosophy.
P.S. — If you’re a teacher and would like to help our friend, email email@example.com.
While I’m looking for my Kashi waffle and stolen peanut butter, the CPS is serving kids Fruit Loops and doughnuts for breakfast.
The 10-year-old boy sat grinning at the colorful cellophane wrappers piled in front of him.
Moments earlier they’d held three warm doughnuts. Now the treats were in the fifth-grader’s belly — along with 600 calories, 18 grams of fat and 36 grams of sugar.
Sure, these reduced-fat doughnuts were nutritionally fortified, but they were still doughnuts, and along with a cup of sweet juice, they made up the Chicago public school student’s entire breakfast.
Something to think about as I pass that quart container of sliced melon priced at 9 dollars. John Mackey, Whole Foods CEO, in the Wall Street Journal.
…the last thing our country needs is a massive new health-care entitlement that will create hundreds of billions of dollars of new unfunded deficits and move us much closer to a government takeover of our health-care system. Instead, we should be trying to achieve reforms by moving in the opposite direction…
Call John Mackey at Whole Foods.
Whole Foods Market, Inc.
550 Bowie Street
Austin, TX 78703-4644
IMPORTANT HEALTH INFORMATION
The Illinois Department of Public Health has notified school officials that there has been an increase in the number of cases of diarrheal illnesses in schools and day care settings.