Joe can’t sleep thinking about charter and unions collaborating?
With Andy Rotherham on vacation, I’ve been kind of bored. No anti-union Democratic Party centrist to mock. And now Joe Williams says he’s going on vacation. But he left a little somethin’ behind.
Williams, the union-hating blogger at Democrats for Education Reform, sounds like he woke up in the middle of the night in a cold sweat.
Is there anything to be gained, politically, by some sort of grand bargain with organized labor?
Why would Williams suddenly be so worried? Is it because there is movement in exactly the direction these Democratic, triangulating, teacher union-bashing think-tankers most fear? You bet.
Great debates to be had on this topic, methinks, especially if we get more people into the mix.
“Methinks?” Who talks like this?
But, Joe. The conversation has started. Where have you been?
I’m concerned because he blogs that he’s in a canoe with his wife and kids, and all this worry might ruin his vacation.
“By the way, I have a pet theory about Alberto Gonzales: I’ve always believed that the reason the President called Gonzales Fredo was that when they first met, Bush incorrectly believed that Gonzales’ first name was Alfredo, and Gonzales was too much of a toady to correct him. I meant to download that theory before it was too late, and the good news is, where this administration is concerned, it’s never going to be too late. It will live forever.”
Once again we revisit the issue of teacher retention. The NY Times has a story by education writer Sam Dillon.
While some school critics who blog continue to put their heads in the sand, among other places, arguing over whether thirty percent or fifty percent of teachers are leaving the profession, the Times suggests that there is a flood of teachers leaving.
Dillon pins the problem to two things: Baby Boomer teachers hitting retirement age (Oh! That would be me!) and what Dillon calls “the stress of working in low performing schools.”
Talk about your euphemisms.
Would I be taking a risk in suggesting that the “stress of working in low performing schools,” is spelled N-C-L-B?
PS: Leo at Edwize makes a similar point.
“Yes the Democrats in Congress took advantage of a deeply unpopular lame duck president by caving into his every whim and agreeing to allow the attorney general to spy on Americans without a warrant.”
Blago takes his hatchet to school funding.
While the budget that came out of the legislature was terrible over all, the early hope was that at least schools came out with something.
The IEA said that they were glad there was more money going to education, although their campaign for a sustainable funding source and equity in funding failed to win the support of the hacks that sit in the house and senate chambers.
But it’s really worse than that now that Blago has wielded his axe.
Check out how the governor’s line-item veto goes after schools here. And the IEA’s analysis can be found here.
After I put up some stuff on my regular “Three over coffee” post, I got referred by the blog site:
It has nothing to do with schools, or anything I normally write about. But if you like coffee…
Catalyst Magazine, the Chicago school reform journal has the discussion between Green Dot’s Steve Barr, the CTU’s President Marilyn Stewart and the IEA’s Jo Anderson, moderated by Small Talk’s Mike Klonsky, transcribed and available on its on-line version here.
I’ve lived in the Logan Square neighborhood of Chicago for 32 years. It’s a predominantly working-class Latino community and it’s home. My kids grew up here. It took me 15 years to buy a house here, but we own one now. Or the bank does. But you get the idea.
Two weeks ago I was at the Palmer Square Arts Fair, a local annual event. I was working the table for the Friends of the Bloomingdale Trail, a group and a project I’ve posted about before. Sitting at the table on a beautiful Saturday afternoon reminded me of what I love about the place: The old guys playing dominoes on card tables on the other side of the park, the smell of arroz con gandules made rich by its aromatic sofrito being sold from the food booth, the elote cart painted radiant blue, the young couples drinking beer at the stand sponsored by Dunlay’s. Megan, my table partner, brings back a mango on a stick, sliced like a golden flower and flavored with lime juice almost too juicy to eat.
Also that week the Chicago Reader, a weekly paper that long ago lost any reality of being “alternative,” did a first section feature on Logan Square. Articles on local architecture, politics, history and lists of restaurants and shops. It was kind of cool to have my neighborhood featured that way.
But this week’s Chicago Reader has a letter from Jesse Mumm, who is identified as “Anthropologist.” Jesse is indeed an anthropologist. But Jesse was a kid down the block, who was and still remains a good friend of my kids. So, I’ve known Jesse Mumm for most of his thirtyfive years.
Jesse’s letter brings a special insight that the Chicago Reader missed about Logan Square.
The articles got many things right, but they mostly missed the Latino community, who remain 65 percent of the people of Logan Square. That omission would be pretty unconscionable in Chinatown or Devon or Paseo Boricua, but gets a pass here because the real-estate boosters have done their work and sold us an image in which most of the neighbors cannot find themselves—except as backdrop. We are reading an imbalanced landscape, through the eyes of gentrification. The real one is much more interesting.