It looks like it will hit the fan in the next twenty-four.

Wednesday night the Illinois Association of School Administrators issued a report on what they thought was coming out of the discussions about state pensions in Springfield.

Because their site is password protected, I’ll print the entire report here:

Pension reform package starting to take shape
Daily meetings this week have produced enough movement that a pension reform bill that appears to answer most constitutional questions, offer employees and retirees choices, maintain the solvency of the pension systems and save the state billions over the next three decades now seems possible.
“As school administrators, there still are some questions we need answers to, but I think the pieces are getting close to being in place that could make a deal possible,” said Dr. Brent Clark, executive director of the Illinois Association of School Administrators (IASA), who has been involved in meetings with legislative leaders and representatives from the governor’s office.
In a meeting Tuesday, two major items tied to the question of constitutionality were moved to the back burner: increasing the age of retirement and increasing the employee contribution. The remaining item considered to be in a gray area – reducing the cost of living adjustment (COLA) – now is included as part of an option tied to health care benefits and future increases in pensionable income as opposed to a unilateral reduction in the COLA.
“Those are big because raising the retirement age clearly was unconstitutional in our view and increasing employee contributions while not increasing or even cutting benefits also was questionable in our view,” Clark said. “We said from the start that we would be part of the solution as long as that solution did not cross over into things that were unconstitutional.”
As currently proposed, current employees and retirees would have to select an option between January 1, 2013, and May 31, 2013. The basic choices would be:
1) Keep their current benefits, including the compound COLA, but not be allowed access to participate in the retiree health insurance plan. Also, future salary increases would be excluded from pensionable income calculations.
2) Accept the new package – including a simple COLA of the lesser of three percent or one-half of the Consumer Price Index each year on the entire amount of the pension – and have access to the retiree health insurance plans, though the details regarding premiums are not yet known. Future salary increases would be included in the pensionable income calculations.
One controversial item for school districts still on the table is shifting the state’s normal pension cost to local school districts, but the plan currently being discussed is to delay that shift until July of 2013 and then implement it one percent a year, giving districts the chance to plan for and better absorb that cost.
“The big question we do not have an answer to yet is what those normal costs are,” Clark said. “Obviously we cannot support that piece until we know that answer and have time to analyze the budgetary impact. Phasing in the cost shift at one percent per year is absolutely essential, but we need to know with a degree of certainty and be able to quantify the extent of the expected normal costs.”
The situation remains very fluid, but other items on the table as of Wednesday include:
  • The state guarantee to pay its share of the unfunded pension liability annually to make the pension systems fully funded in 30 years or by 2043.
  • A special actuary from the Auditor General’s Office to review the pension systems’ work and make recommendation to the General Assembly as to what payments the state must make each year.
  • School districts being prohibited from making the employee portion of the Teachers’ retirement System (TRS) pension contributions upon expiration of the current contracts and collective bargaining agreements. Many districts now pay all or part of the employee portion as part of negotiated contracts.
  • The Early Retirement Option (ERO) would be permanently extended on an individual basis without significant penalty to the employer, if the employee agreed to take the pension reform deal.
  • Establishment of a cash balance investment opportunity for employees if the employer and employee agreed to participate.
  • The Teachers’ Retirement System (TRS) Board of Directors would be reconstituted to include an equal representation of management and labor because school districts would be paying for the normal cost of the pension system.
  • Other regulatory relief issues pertaining to financial and operational management.
The effects of the bill would be felt July 1, 2013, with the employee election period being from January 1 through May 31 of 2013 as mentioned earlier.
“Everyone knows that the employees did not create this pension crisis and there are those that say employees should not have to shoulder the expense of putting the pension systems back on sound footing,” Clark said. “But it is what it is and we need to come up with a solution that makes the systems solvent for all current and future retirees and gives school districts a legitimate chance to cope with the fiscal hardships being placed on them.
“At the end of the day, it’s about being fair to employees and school districts while providing a quality education for children. We think those three things are still possible.”
Since the IASA report on Wednesday I have received other reports that Madigan has a bill ready to go that is far worse than what the IASA is describing. One authoritative source says the IASA report is simply wrong.
The sources are saying a really bad bill will emerge in the next 24 hours.
It looks more and more like we are about to move to a lawyer’s holiday. If it passes this will all end up in court.
I have also received questions about the timing of my criticisms of IEA leadership. We are in the last days of the General Assembly session. Perhaps this is the time to put these issues on the back burner.
I didn’t bring them front and center.
But if the leadership is going to make claims about the great job they have done, I have to rub my eyes and ask, “Do I see what I see?”
They claim 70,000 phone calls. But these have been through the labor coalition. We Are One. The coalition includes the IFT and AFSCME among others. Nobody can say what part of those calls were made by an IEA mobilization. If past efforts are any indication, the IEA didn’t produce much.
Recent IEA website posts have mentioned the rank-and-file actions in Naperville, Orland Park, Elgin and Plainfield. Surely Jim Reed’s people aren’t taking credit for these actions. This would be like Mittens taking credit for the auto bail-out.
Charlie McBarron didn’t even have the decency to cover our Region’s Lobby Day trip to Springfield on May 2nd, even though we had lunch with IEA VP Kathi Griffin and Secretary-Treasurer Al Llorens right in the IEA headquarters. We had 60 teachers who traveled 8 hours and the guy couldn’t spare a photographer in his own building.
They didn’t bother to mention the rank-and-file on-line petition to the governor until it almost reached the goal of 33,000 signatures.
So, what did they do?