The Real Pension Obstructionist: A Letter to a Legislator.

mike
Dear Representative and Senator,
We do not often get second chances, but all of you in the General Assembly are about to be granted another test of your allegiance to the Illinois Constitution and your political fortitude to find real and honorable answers to the Illinois “pension crisis.”
Let’s be clear about one real truth.  No matter how many of you are singled out and castigated by the Chicago Tribune for being hesitant or even thoughtful, the egregious falsehood perpetrated by the corporate media – even without Koch brother ownership – is the following: a characterization that budget woes in Illinois are a result of“diverting money from education and health care and other essential services to preserve pension benefits that are crushing the state” (Tribune Editorial  June 16, 13).
That’s an untruth, Representative and Senator.   You know it and I know it.
Having to pay down a $100 billion debt on past avoidance (not diversion) of making required pension payments is actually what’s financially crushing the State of Illinois.  In fact the normal costs of pension payments have remained quite static or, as in last year, even less. 
The Tribune editorial board and Bruce Dold, always a willing messenger for the Civic Committee of the Commercial Club of Chicago, have enacted this falsity in order to avoid the very real financial remedies available to any state, but not one like ours –  subjected to the onerous dictatorship of a single politician like Speaker Madigan.
Notice how the Tribune always combines the debt payment and the normal costs to make its specious points?  By not separating the two, the normal person does not realize a re-amortization of the debt owed for stealing pension moneys could be paid off without the crazy and punitive climbing cost developed by the General Assembly (with help for the corporates) in 1995.  Why isn’t Madigan or someone promoting that possibility?
And if you think that Speaker Madigan is about to allow you as an elected official to think independently about what is possibly unconstitutional, or what is immoral, what is financially possible or ameliorative, think again.  He has eviscerated the union backed bill SB2404 to hold over the head of Senate Leader Cullerton – a childish and twisted parody of Solomon.  Extreme power without wisdom.
Will the Representatives in the House scurry under the domination of the Speaker and vote “aye” on his new machination?  Will my own Representative fall into line as she did so easily with SB1?  I hope not.  I hope that she and others realize that another forced vote on a mutant original bill is a slap in the face of not only thoughtful colleagues in the Senate, but a derisive and cynical demonstration of just how little the Speaker thinks of their offices – in both houses.
Will the Senate also allow SB1 reviving life and fall into line with the leader’s dark vision in the other house?
I wish you well, and I wish you the strength to look for better answers to the financial hole Illinois politicians (not public workers) have excavated for nearly eighty years.
Sincerely,

 

7 thoughts on “The Real Pension Obstructionist: A Letter to a Legislator.

  1. If Ill did not owe the $100B to the plans, what do the actuaries estimate a “normal” annual payment be to the plans be to maintain an 80+% funding level? Is this in the public domain?

  2. No matter what form, SB2404 IS NOT the solution. The solution is a fundamental graduated state tax. If not that, then the removal of all the special interest tax exemptions that exist for the corporations.

  3. The United States Constitution was written by brave men who English authorities viewed as “obstructionists.” Currently the Chicago Tribune Editorial Board is taking the exact same tactic. Bullying honorable men and women who are representing their constituency and following the tenets of the State of Illinois’s Constitution as their oath of office requires. Honor and righteousness thankfully prevailed in that battle.

    It is ironic that a profit-driven entity, such as the Chicago Tribune (which by the way suffered through an extended, painful bankruptcy procedure) feels compelled to offer financial solutions regarding pensions while ignorantly disregarding Constitutional law. Is there a self-serving motive?

  4. Tribune….Chicago. Quinn…Chicago. Cullerton….Chicago. Dictator Madigan…..Chicago. Self-serving motive? “Following the tenets of the Constitution as their oath of office requires.” Requires. Doesn’t say it is a choice or used only to accomplish what they want. Required. Will somebody in the GA PLEASE stand up and inform the big 3 that there is a Constitution??? Since our legislators mostly make over $100k pension per year, they don’t care? We need new leadership in this state that we can actually define as leadership.

  5. Our local Pantagraph stated the lawmakers make $111/day for special session. That’s $40K to the state and taxpayers, just to rape retirees. Some have said they would donate to charity. So basically the state is making a charitable contribution, right? If SB1 was defeated (as Madigan had a tantrum and stomped out), why is it even up for discussion again??

Leave a comment