Another unsatisfied customer.

Mr. Klonsky.

Are you kidding me? Have you watched ANY of this trial??? Obviously not.

You do a great disservice by posting a picture of a 12-year-old. Martin was nearly 6 feet tall, hardly the little boy being portrayed. Please remove me from your blog.

Judging from this post you do not consider all angles before stating your opinion. Sad.

-Anonymous

 

Dear Anonymous,

Sorry. I don’t bother going to the trouble of removing subscribers upon request. You’ll just have to delete the email notice.

I would like to point out the inconsistency of you asking me to remove you as a subscriber because I don’t consider all angles before stating an opinion.

– Fred

10 thoughts on “Another unsatisfied customer.

  1. Fred,
    So why are you so sure he’s guilty? You make it sound like you were there.
    Have you listened or read about the trial? If you put yourself in a jurors shoes are you so sure you would not have any doubt at all about what happened? The DA was under tremendous pressure to bring charges in the first place, it took him a few weeks, and now the white house is supposedly injecting themselves into the equation, and the judge has taken unprecedented steps to make the defendant look bad in front of the jury, but yet you are damn sure he’s guilty, without a doubt. Really???

  2. I saw a photo I wish I hadn’t; it was the young man dead on the ground, and he had on khakis. Khakis. Not baggy jeans, not falling down pants–but khakis.

  3. Consistency is very important to me. I consistently follow people who faithfully do their homework and base their opinions on reality, not fiction or half truths. It isn’t evident in this post that you really spent time researching the facts in this case and instead just parroted comments from people screaming it’s all about race. Did you watch the video of Martin at 7-11 buying skittles and tea? Do you know any of his school history? Drug history? Gun history? Fighting history? Testimony from his 19-year-old girlfriend who initially claimed she was 16? How much of this trial have you actually watched? I think you owe your followers more than posting a picture of a 12-year-old and pulling the race card.

    1. Debbie,
      I don’t have “followers.” I write a blog. If I did have followers, you aren’t the one to tell me what I owe them. Zimmerman stalked Trayvon Martin for no other reason than he was Black. He had no legal right to stalk him. He was told by the police not to stalk him. If he hadn’t stalked him, Trayvon would be alive. It’s all about race. You want to create some bullshit theories and troll the blogs to promote it, do it somewhere else. You won’t be posting here again. Why? I’m playing (or “pulling,” as you put it) the “it’s my blog” card.

  4. Zimmerman had no right to follow the young man in the first place. The police have a recording of their conversation with Zimmerman where he swore and used racial slurs and the police told Zimmerman to not follow Trayvon. Zimmerman racially profiled this young man and then used a gun to shoot him. I hope he gets the highest amount of jail time and spends the rest of his life in prison. By the way I have a 5 feet tall 10 year old adopted black grandson who’s mother, my daughter is an attorney. If this Zimmerman gets off it’ll be a travesty and I’ll worry more for my William and other boys who’s simple crime for racists is that they are black.

  5. Interesting how “anonymous” says, “obviously not”. Nothing is obvious if he asks you a question then answers it himself, He/She believes what they want to believe before knowing the truth. He/She proved they make assumptions about you, Just like he/she most likely made a lot of assumptions about neighborhood “watch” people who take mixed martial arts 3 days a week and follow unarmed teens then exit their car after being told not even to follow. Thanks for you great rebuttal. Kathleen

Leave a comment