The Chuy we have been waiting for.

Kicked ass.

Candidate debates often remind me of the Babble Machine that my old pal Les Perelman invented. Les directed the undergraduate writing program at MIT. He is a critic of computer-scored writing assessments. To prove his point he invented a machine that “reads” essay responses, looking for keywords. It doesn’t matter that the essay makes no sense. If the essay contains the keywords the machine will score the essay well.

Last night’s second mayoral debate was like that in some ways . You could tell the phrases that both Chuy and Rahm were prepped to say.

But it was when they went off message that the real two candidates were exposed.

For good and bad.

You could see the two Rahm’s fighting with themselves. There was the modulated, passionless technocrat that repeated the same things over and over.

Yet every once in a while the real Rahm – the one that rubs us all the wrong way – came out. Nasty and whining.

“Let me finish. Let me finish,” Rahm cried when Chuy interrupted Rahm’s long-winded BS.

This was also true for Chuy.

He had his prepared talking points.

It was when he broke free and spoke like the community organizer he used to be that the real Chuy came out.

“You single-handedly closed it? People worked on it for 10 years before you were ever elected. You were still in Washington,” Chuy laughed when Rahm took credit for closing the coal plants in Chuy’s own neighborhood.

“You just showed up to cut the ribbons.”

It was Chuy come alive.

He has been given a shot in the arm by the neighborhood response to the tale-of-two-cities campaign.

He started the campaign as pinch-hitter for CTU President Karen Lewis.

Last night it changed.

Chuy was what my friend, retired city Streets and San guy Pasqual, calls El Toro.

The Bull.

12 thoughts on “The Chuy we have been waiting for.

  1. I was streaming the debate last night and sometimes the video was a bit choppy. Appeared that Rahm refused to shake Chuy’s hand at end – turning quickly away from Chuy in a “I really didn’t see him extend his hand to me” moment and instead walking around the “desk” to shake the hand of the moderator. If I am wrong, please correct me as I am inclined to always believe the worst about the mayor.

  2. People, let us be smart here!! What are the programs these two offer?? We must see them before making an judgments! What are their pension plans for our troubled system?

    1. Chuy differs from Rahm in two important and essential ways. Rahm has already cut promised, contractual and constitutionally protected pension benefits without even waiting for the Supreme Court to rule. Chuy says he will not touch the benefits of current retirees and the rest he wants to negotiate with the unions. As Mayor, he can ask. It is the job of our unions to defend our interests.

  3. Well said Brother Fred.

    Robin Potter & Associates, PC, 111 E. Wacker Drive #2600, Chicago, IL. 60601
    [312] 861-1800- [fax] 312 861-3009
    Conference call line [605) 475-6006, 221416
    robin@potterlaw.org; Cell: [773] 575-6216

  4. Fred,
    Your description of Rahm, the Wrong, as a “passionless technocrat” is synonymous with the description of him that I read almost a decade ago. I don’t recall who the author was but he called Rahm a “Clinton apparatchik.” I have a feeling that many others have used similar epithets to describe this loathsome so and so.

  5. Did anyone catch the post-debate “fact-checking?” During the debate, Rahm accused Chuy of flip-flopping over full-day kindergarten, and Chuy accused Rahm of mandating it without funding it which created overcrowded classrooms and cuts to art and library, etc.. So, which do you think they focused on? Right. They rolled tape that supposedly showed that Chuy was against all-day kindergarten. Not a word about Rahm not funding it.

Leave a comment