Scum bags.

I received some interesting reactions to my post on pension abuse.

This week the Illinois legislature, facing billions of dollars in unpaid pension obligations, took a bold stand and made it illegal in the future for someone to collect from the Teacher Retirement System based on earnings they would have received if they left the clasroom to work for a teachers union.

That was how they responded to their failure to meet their obligations.

GOP Illinois House leader Tom Cross, author of the pension killing Senate Bill 512, also wrote this bill. A bigger diversion you will be hard pressed to find.

I got sucked in to this diversion, I suppose. And I’m not sorry. Some people called these guys “scum bags.” I think it is misplaced and wasted anger.

The Chicago Baboon started this faux controversy with a lame expose of two teacher union employees who qualified for TRS benefits because they substitute taught for one day and then went on the union payroll.

This was all quite legal, of course.

And the TRS contribution is entirely theirs while on the union payroll. The state and the taxpayers were obligated to pay nothing.

And more than that, from the viewpoint of a union guy (me) quite appropriate. We have lots of teachers who taught in classrooms for many years and then became full-time union staffers. That’s good. I want teachers doing paid union work. That means real teacher experience is represented in the work they do. To qualify for TRS, you have to draw the line somewhere. One day or fifty? What’s the principal involved?

This whole issue isn’t a scam on the part of the unions. It’s a diversion on the part of the union haters like the Chicago Baboon, Ty Fahner of the Civic Committee and House Leader Tom Cross.

Pay us what you owe us and stop looking for alleged corruption in low places.

3 thoughts on “Scum bags.

  1. Sorry but I have to disagree. While obviously there are much bigger fish to fry and these few pensions aren’t the root of the problem, as I said earlier they put a face on the issue and become an easy target for the 1% crowd and the teabaggers.

    Your justification for these guys has been that what they did was “legal”. This is a sad obfuscation of what they did. When Jerry Reinsdorf got the taxpayers to pay for his restaurant it was legal. When Sears and Caterpillar and the CBOE held the taxpayers hostage in the name of jobs it was legal. A lot of the shenanigans surrounding the mortgage bubble was legal. It doesn’t mean it was right.

    These two lobbyists used inside information and blatantly gamed the system in order to secure themselves millions of dollars directly out of TRS. They were stealing from all of us by using their knowledge of the laws coming down the pike

    As for the question of teachers that go to work for the union – I don’t see it the same way you do. If a teacher works for 25 years as a teacher and earns a $75,000 pension, but spends the last 4 years of their career working for the union making $350k as a lobbyist, should they be entitled to a $300k pension? Does their work with the union entitle them to 4x the pension of their fellow teachers? No. The law was poorly written and the changes to it are positive.

    As I said, obviously these are the small potatoes of the debate and obviously these issues were brought up to distract from the real issues at hand, but it doesn’t make what these two guys did right. Legal does not equal right.

    It’s ok, we can agree to disagree and still keep our eyes on he big prize.

  2. I was incorrect on a couple of the specific figures but I think the broad strokes of my point are all correct. Anyway the point is moot, the loophole is theoretically closed and as I stated earlier there are much MUCH bigger fish to fry.

Leave a comment