Three Card Monte, Nekritz style.

nekritz

Three-card Monte, also known as the Three-card marneyThree-card trickThree-WayThree-card shuffleMenage-a-cardTripletsFollow the ladyLes Trois Perdants (French for Three Losers), le BonneteauFind the ladyBola bola or Follow the Bee is a confidence game in which the victim, or mark, is tricked into betting a sum of money, on the assumption that they can find the money card among three face-down playing cards. It is the same as the shell game except that cards are used instead of “shells”.

Pension bomber, Representative Elaine Nekritz, has responded to Ralph Martire’s numbers in the debate about state revenues. Martire of the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability has argued that what Illinois faces is a revenue problem, not a pension problem.

Nektritz responds:

Thanks so much for your response.  I am familiar with Mr. Martire’s proposal.

 The reality is his proposal would require a payment of almost $9 billion into the pension systems next year. The current year payment is “only” $5.7 billion. We could decimate General State Aid for schools by about 75% in order to pay for it, or raise the income tax another 1%. I don’t believe either of those are good for Illinois.
Mr. Martire omits some very important points in his article. The first is that his payment amount does not include the going forward cost of the pensions…the cost that actually funds current teachers versus the cost of those already retired. Second, his proposal only truly works if the State is somehow magically able to turn the pension debt into bonded debt. The markets would never accept $85 billion worth of bonds from Illinois. Thus, his proposal ignores actuarial science, something I believe the Teachers unions and the Teachers Retirement System do not, in any way shape or form, support. I have great respect for Mr. Martire and I wish there was a painless way out of this mess but I do not believe Mr. Martire has a solution that is tenable.
Nekritz’s response has caused some to believe her and bet on one of her three cards: That pension costs are higher than what Martire claims. That state aid would be reduced by 75% “in order to pay for it,” or that we raise the income tax by 1%.
But those are shell choices.
Tim Furman did what makes the most sense. He called Amanda Kass at the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability and asked for feedback.
The point is that Nekrtiz gives short shrift to the revenue issue and avoids the case for restructuring the debt.
Nothing will dissuade her from her desire to cut promised pensions as the only solution.
That shouldn’t con anybody.

3 thoughts on “Three Card Monte, Nekritz style.

  1. I think the telling phrase for Biss and Nekritz is the “Republican point of view”…..these two are not really Democrats… and they are funded by who?

  2. As was exemplified by today’s filibuster fiasco—it’s not a Dem vs. Rep. issue. It’s a power and money vs. the rest of us issue.

  3. Here are some considerations that Rep. Nekritz omits in her response to Ralph Matire’s suggestions. The General Assembly is already acting on borrowed time for the 2% increase the Democrats forced through an earlier lame duck session, an increase designed to sunset in 2015. With the current state of affairs in Illinois, the fiscal irresponsibility and scapegoating of nearly 600,000+ public sector employees; an assurance of a “next” Democratic governor is certainly questionable. Would-be governors are already gearing up for their runs in 2014. Are we all so sure that the end result will be a Democratic governor? Attacking the public sector workers will certainly make for a different election process in 2014.

    Perhaps Rep. Nekritz might consider some other methods. By making the 2% tax increase a permanent fix dedicated for the state’s unfunded liability is to provide $7 billion for an initial payment to a bond issue for the unfunded liability – one for $96+ billion which could be paid back in 25 years. While Rep. Nekritz wonders at the possibility of selling such an amount of debt, the guarantee of a dedicated stream of revenue to pay back the $96+ billion in debt will undoubtedly make bond rating companies sit up and take notice. The movement from soft debt to a hard debt commitment will assure a consistent numerical payment on a yearly basis, one which will decline in impact over the 25 years it is being paid off. Such a delineated schedule might bring more purchasers than one would expect, especially in our current economy.

    Let’s remember, unlike the current 1995 ramp, at which Rep. Nekritz would have us all continue throwing exponentially increasing amounts of money, the payment on dedicated unfunded liability debt would remain flat over the next 25 years. And, assuredly, the current economic flat line will not remain for that period of time. Finally, given the possibility of a Republican governor or in an attempt to find across-the-aisle agreement, why not have a bi-partisan commitment to correcting the fiscal malfeasance taken out on the pension systems for so many years by the General Assembly? The solution would be morally correct and Constitutionally correct. More importantly, it would stop this Democratic refrain to manufacture some small responsibility in the public sector a reason to cause all the pain for those in the State of Illinois who did all that was asked and planned on futures based upon promises given and payments made.

Leave a comment