“Dr.” Terrence P. Carter and Chicago’s New Leaders for New Schools.

If you have been following the sordid story of Terrence P. Carter and his attempt to doctor his resume than you probably don’t live in Chicago.

The local media isn’t interested in the story.

Carter got busted for claiming a doctorate from Stanford and other universities. It is a degree he didn’t earn.

The Chicago connection is the story about how a guy, Jonathan Schnur, whose background is business – not education – created a fast track to jobs as CPS administrators that mirrors Teach for America’s fast track to jobs as classroom teachers.

The organization is New Leaders for New Schools – Now named simply, New Leaders. Over the past decade they selected candidates and have filled many of the principal positions in CPS schools. This is particularly true of charter schools and turnaround schools.

As one CPS principal told me, Schnur and NLNS took a critique of university administrative programs – some of which was accurate – and removed most of what was good about the existing programs, reconceptualizing the administrative role in purely technocratic terms.

Carter was the poster child for New Leaders for New Schools.

Ben Fenton was a cofounder and chief strategy and knowledge officer for New Leaders for New Schools. He is former management consultant at McKinsey & Co.

In an article for ASCD, Fenton writes:

Before they begin the recruiting and selection processes, highly effective principals take the time to identify exactly whom they are looking for. In general, they seek out candidates who demonstrate content knowledge and core pedagogical skills. But they also focus on broader selection criteria that are often overlooked:

First and foremost, a genuine connection to and interest in students.
Second, a deep commitment to the belief that every student is capable of academic success.
Third, a focus on driving measurable student learning outcomes.
Finally, essential personal attributes—such as a willingness to make teaching practice public and to constantly learn and improve—on top of a capacity for teamwork, leadership, and cultural competency.

More specifically, highly effective principals look for teachers who are a good fit for the school’s particular culture and instructional approach. Even as early as the hiring process, they are looking for teachers who exhibit potential to develop into future leaders.

With these criteria, finding teachers who are a perfect fit may seem like a herculean task. Terrence Carter, a New Leaders principal at Clara Barton Elementary School in Chicago, remarks, “It is literally like looking for a needle in a haystack.”

Fenton describes model recruitment practices of NLNS alum Terrence Carter:

After having identified potential teacher candidates, highly effective principals rigorously screen to select candidates who have the most potential to increase student learning and contribute to their school’s culture. They also look for candidates who have the experience and content knowledge to fill gaps on grade-level or content-area teams.

Just as New Leaders for New Schools’ selection process tightly aligns with our criteria for successful candidates, highly effective principals also create a strong connection between the knowledge, skills, beliefs, and orientations they hope to see in their teachers and the process they use to select them.

The selection process typically involves

An application.

Interviews with the principal and leadership teams.

Demonstration lessons with teachers, students, and sometimes even parents.

Opportunities for candidates to receive constructive feedback and reflect on their own learning and professional growth.

Where possible, candidates should demonstrate measurable student achievement growth in their prior work.

At Clara Barton, Carter also requires candidates to study his school’s student achievement data and discuss how they might propel it forward. Highly effective principals and their leadership teams focus interview questions on the candidate’s belief in the academic potential of every student and willingness to engage in professional learning. Alignment in these areas is considered nonnegotiable, and teacher leaders play a key role in assessing whether the candidate is a good fit for the school’s culture.

After hiring, highly effective principals and their leadership teams engage new teachers in a robust induction process to orient them to the school’s cultural norms. In forthcoming columns, we’ll examine two essential elements of school culture for dramatically improving schools: building student aspirations for academic success and instituting a caring, learning-focused, schoolwide code of conduct.

This all couldn’t be more ironic given the current troubles involved in Terrence P. Carters plagiarized and fraudulent application for New London school superintendent.

New Leaders for New Schools, along with the Academy for Urban School Leadership have all played a significant role in Chicago’s corporate driven school reform movement.

As in the case of Teach for America which has produced good individual teachers, there are fine individual principals that came out of New Leaders.

This is an issue of systematic and institutional corporate reform taking over a city’s schools.

And Carter is also a product of it.

7 thoughts on ““Dr.” Terrence P. Carter and Chicago’s New Leaders for New Schools.

  1. Carter is their test canary, their shining star, their poster guy!
    His sociopathic conduct fit the bill, tell them what they want to hear, I’ll be whatever you want me to be, you want test scores…how high?
    His test scores increases, to anyone who understands testing, would have been huge red flags.
    Just as in Atlanta Public Schools, increases of ^70% in Reading & Math should have been throbbing with red lights. But, not when noneducators corp types only look at numbers, no clue what they represent, and squeezing imposters through another million dollar pipeline…well, try to put a shine on that turd! Or, Chicago will just ignore it. Try holding your breath & we will all benefit. Shysters!

    1. Fist, H.A.,I’ve enjoyed reading your comments both on Fred’s & Diane’s blogs–you are one smart cookie & are always spot-on. That having been said, I wouldn’t use the term of “their test canary” in the same sentence as Carter being called ” their shining star.” Isn’t a test canary one that is sent down into the coal mines to detect the presence of carbon minoxide? Of course, if it’s there, the canary dies, & miners’ lives are saved.
      Or–is this irony that you meant? (If so, you are even more clever than I’ve previously stated!) Still, my prediction is that the guy will end up with a cushy job at the “Always Earning” Pear$on. Just like Arne.

  2. OMG, every time they say “highly effective” I want to scream!
    Why do all these reformers sound like replicants? Like people who are deeply immersed in a cult? Highly effective, to scale, with fidelity, rigorous, change agent, disruptive, blah, blah, blah. My bullshit-o-meter is off the charts.
    The Harvard Graduate School of Education must be an absolute joke, underwriting this nonsense. I guess they needed another department for all the rich but stupid children of alums who wanted more choices than the business and management department for majors.
    And another thing! Business people have messed up a lot of stuff, mortgage bubbles, adjustable rate mirages, insider trading, scandal here and scandal there. Their models and methods don’t even work in their own area of expertise–keep them out of schools!

    1. Thanks for the kind words.
      Sometimes I just can’t take it anymore & let’er rip.
      Über sad and über angry about the abuse of teachers.
      I read your comments regularly…old retired farts!

  3. Mary G.~
    You absolutely hit the nail on the head. Harvard…Harvard…Harvard…
    Nothing but questionable non-educators policy puppets sticking it to teachers.
    The arrogance smells to high heaven.
    Bet, none of them have ever touched a sweaty child, got sneezed on, or wiped a runny nose.
    Mary, please think about posting your entire comment -everywhere. Please!
    We must give it back. The character assassinations, paternalistic – on the plantation treatment we have endured is outrageous. Enough! Insulting! Who do these near-do-wells think we are. Of all people, public policy, corporate types and legislators have ruined just about everything we associate with the American Way.
    We owe it to the children.

  4. Hello, I am a resident of New London, CT and I was reading some of your articles on Mr. Carter. One of my daughters is entering Kindergarten this year and Mr. Carter was at both the orientation and open house for her new last minute school due to overcrowded classrooms in other schools. That’s another story. My husband came with and I told him about what was happening with “Dr.” Carter. He told me his first impression of him, before knowing the story, was that he was a con-man! I just give the man a glare. He showed up at the orientation with a folder that said State of Connecticut, Department of Education on the front. He never opened it. Just used it to flash around and spent most of the meeting on the phone. My perception is that most of the administrators do their best to ignore him. What an embarrassing situation for New London. We have enough problems already. I actually have been homeschooling my children but would like to give public school a chance for one of my daughters for her own individual reasons. Thank you for the facts about Dr. Carter.. I really hope Dr. Carter goes away.

  5. R.H. ~
    Please keep us posted and alert others in the community. We have enough charlatans playing & pretending to be education experts. Crawling with them! Spread the word, ask questions & send out info.

Leave a comment