Public employees want unity in the defense of our pensions. And transparency.

klickna

A few days ago the Illinois Retired Teachers Association filed suit in a Cook County Court. This was the first of what will be other legal actions against Senate Bill 1. SB1 was passed on December 3rd. It is a dagger to the heart of public employee pensions in Illinois.

“A model for the nation,” said Squeezy, the Governor.

I am a member and unit leader of an IRTA chapter. I am also a leader of an Illinois Education Association Retired chapter.

I posted about the IRTA suit. I also reposted Glen Brown’s questions about IEA President Cinda Klickna’s presence on the TRS board of trustees. He asked if Klickna wasn’t in a conflict of interest. I think this is a reasonable question for which there has been no response.

The TRS board is a defendant in the IRTA suit.

I posted relevant comments from former TRS Excutive Director Jon Bauman and current TRS board member Bob Lyons.

Some readers – supporters of current IEA leadership – wrote to me suggesting all kinds of evil intent on the part of the IRTA.

I posted some of it. I won’t post any more of it. I read it and delete it.

I don’t suggest that I am any kind of expert on legal strategy. That’s what the lawyers get paid big bucks to figure out.

But as a member of both organizations, a former public employee, a member of TRS and a retiree who is very concerned about his financial future, I expect the leaders of organizations who claim to represent us to stop the bullshit.

Your high-priced law firms have differences over strategy? Work it out.

One group represents union members? One represents retirees? Work it out.

From where I sit, the IEA leadership and their most vocal defenders have been the most willing to break this unity. For what purpose? Who does this help?

Remember that it was the IRTA that has stood firm on the issue of retirees retaining all their promised COLA. They refused to concede what was promised when others were willing to give it away.

It was the IRTA that established a defense fund specifically to be used to defend our pensions against anything the legislature passed which violated the constitutional pension protection clause.

Aside from raising actual dollars, this was a brilliant way of drawing pension members into the fight to defend their own rights.

In addition to unity among the groups representing Illinois public employees we want information and transparency.

The IEA website hasn’t been updated in two weeks.

The last time they said anything about responding to SB1 was on December 5th.

I think that members of all organizations representing us in this fight for our pensions should look with suspicion upon anyone who calls themselves a leader who drives a wedge between organizations.

Whether it is a leader of the IRTA, the IEA or any other group.

I think that all members of all organizations representing us in this fight for our pensions should expect transparency and a steady flow of information.

I have participated in bargaining many contracts. Our bargaining teams always took the position that a steady flow of information to members was as important as anything that went on at the bargaining table.

We diligently sought out member input into our bargaining issues. We planned building meetings. We used surveys. We constantly reported back on the progress of bargaining.

No. Not everything could be discussed.

But we never made what we couldn’t share an obstacle to sharing as much as we could. Regularly. Intentionally.

That’s not the way IEA leadership has chosen to play this game.

But it’s our pension we’re fighting for after all.

13 thoughts on “Public employees want unity in the defense of our pensions. And transparency.

  1. Fred, Well stated and accurate summary of what needs to be done next. I can’t imagine any strategy that would benefit from IEA “Silence” on the critical issue of a unified response.

  2. The wife and I just donated money to the IRTA legal fund. I urge all to do so. Divide and conquer is/has/will be the strategy of the other side. We do not need to assist them with our pettiness and ego defenses. Some people think that they are the sole possessors of truth and wisdom that self absorbed way of thinking will only make our struggle harder. Fred thanks again for your involvement and insight.

  3. Some of us are watching this VERY closely in Massachusetts. We are a non-Social Security state like Illinois. Our pension has an unfunded iability dating back to the 1960’s, when a governor too a “holiday” from making the state contribution, and subsequent pols have pushed back the “payback” date several times…we have, obviously, made all OUR contributions out of our paychecks, and in creased OUR contribution rate several times with MTA (NEA) support, currently 11%. If the IEA sells out its retired former members, forgetting that ALL their members hope to become retired members, then we’ll know the exact nature of the retiree-active union relationship. I, too, have been a knee-jerk union supporter (up to Executive Committee of MTA level) for my whole life, an urban local president, as well.
    At our Annual Meeting of delegates last year, an MTA supported plan to require members to work up to 30 years to qualify for retirement health insurance got STIFF resistance for higher education members, school nurses, and vocational school teachers (all of whome tend to start their teaching careers late, and who will have trouble making that 30-year threshhold), and the Presdent of MTA said into his microphone (paraphrasing because I have not been able to get the exact wording),”obviously if you believe that ‘an injury to one is an injury to all, you will not support this.” And MTA supported the motion…meaning they do not believe that an injury to one is an injury to all. I almost choked, hearing that. So we are watching Illlinois carefully. Will your union sell out its retired members?

  4. https://www.facebook.com/pages/SURS-SERS-TRS-Retirees-Class-Action/167091270108868 Fred you may or may not want to post this but its another lawsuit being considered by retirees . There is info about the WARO lawsuit which is separate . I am pretty sure this site is closely linked to UPI which is IFT .There are links to all the union facebook pages which seem to be updated more often than their other webpages. This lawsuit may be federal they are just meeting with lawyers. There may be some federal issues with this mess of a so called reform Since Sqeeezy will appeal I don’t see a real big problem with several suits According to this site they had a hard problem getting lawyers interested in a state case because they expect the WARO to be so massive. I have been worried more about the unions taking the political action that is needed than the lawsuit. The IFT/AFSCME MAAG suit really reassured me ….Here is the SEIU 73 page we need all the unions to commit to what SEIU 73 said in their Dec 5 comments on SB 1…they should all be defeated
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/SURS-SERS-TRS-Retirees-Class-Action/167091270108868 AFSCME cut of the House dems years ago but the 2 biggest political donors (IEA and IFT) need to do the same . I am sure CTU which is part of IFT has .
    I know of at least one UPI delegate who has asked them to do the same and work with CTU.

    You guys need to keep the heat on IEA and the rest of IFT
    Thanks for doing that Fred and everyone

    BTW I am not that worried about union reps on TRS or SURS. We need them there to stop them from putting our money with Wall Street PE and Hedge funds owned by people that are trying to cut our pensions aka Rauner.. I would gladly say to the court I would not want for a minute to follow this illegal action-SB1

  5. Fred,

    Please be aware that your former local. the PREA, made a monetary donation to the IRTA Legal Defense Fund against the wishes and advice of Cinda Klickna. Cinda personally emailed the local president discouraging our local from donating to IRTA.

  6. Time for the IEA to get some new leadership. Their silence and waffling speaks volumes. You can guess what is going on by what they do not say. I’m sticking with the IRTA. They will fight for me.

  7. The IEA has always been weak and divided with little leadership or INSPIRATION to the individual districts. As a result, many TRS memebers are apathetic, having been uninformed or ignored when they were teachers. IRTA, on the other hand, has been the ONLY organization consistent from the beginning when it expressed outrage when COLA reductions were mentioned.

  8. What can possibly be “evil” about filing a law suit to protect our pensions? There is no room for turf battles in this effort!

  9. I agree that the I.E.A. should be a partner with the I.R. T. A . in all phases of the effort to protect our pensions and not go their separate ways.

Leave a comment